From Extraction to Accountability: Aligning CSR with ESG and the Petroleum Industry Act

“For sixty years, hundreds of billions of dollars have flowed out of these swamps, yet there is little or nothing to show for it.”

These words, spoken by His Majesty Ògíamẹ̀ Atuwatsé III, CFR, the Olú of Warri, cut through decades of carefully worded corporate statements and well-funded CSR brochures. They articulate a reality oil-producing communities across Nigeria have lived with for generations: extraction without accountability.

When the Olu of Warri further declared that he would not allow oil companies to repeat the failures of the past, it signalled something deeper than royal advocacy. It marked a shift in tone, expectation, and power dynamics.

For Nigeria’s extractive sector, this moment should be understood clearly. The era of discretionary, cosmetic, and reactive CSR is over. The combination of the Petroleum Industry Act (PIA) and global ESG expectations has fundamentally altered the rules of engagement.

The Cost of Ignoring Communities

Nigeria’s oil wealth has long existed in sharp contrast with the realities of host communities. Environmental degradation, youth unemployment, social unrest, and fragile local economies coexist with billion-dollar balance sheets and global energy portfolios.

This contradiction is not accidental. It is the outcome of decades of CSR approaches that prioritised corporate convenience over community reality.

Projects were often:

• Designed without proper needs assessments
• Announced without community ownership
• Implemented without long-term sustainability
• Publicised without measurable outcomes

The result has been predictable: distrust, conflict, pipeline vandalism, litigation, and loss of social licence to operate.

CSR that ignores community voices does not reduce risk. It multiplies it.

The Petroleum Industry Act: A Line in the Sand

The Petroleum Industry Act represents Nigeria’s clearest attempt to correct historical imbalances in the extractive sector. Its provisions on Host Community Development Trusts (HCDTs) are not symbolic. They are structural.

The PIA makes it clear that:

• Host communities are not beneficiaries of corporate goodwill
• They are stakeholders with defined rights
• Development must be planned, funded, and governed transparently

Yet legislation alone does not guarantee impact. Without discipline, HCDTs risk becoming another box-ticking exercise.

Aligning CSR with the PIA requires companies to abandon old habits and embrace a fundamentally different approach to community development.

ESG Changes the Conversation

Global ESG standards reinforce what the PIA demands locally. Environmental, Social, and Governance frameworks insist on accountability, traceability, and transparency.

For extractive companies operating in Nigeria, ESG expectations now shape:

• Access to international capital
• Relationships with development finance institutions
• Investor confidence
• Brand reputation beyond national borders

In practical terms, ESG asks uncomfortable but necessary questions:

• How are community priorities identified?
• Who participates in decision-making?
• What environmental safeguards are enforced?
• How are outcomes measured and disclosed?

CSR that cannot answer these questions credibly is no longer defensible.

From Projects to Processes

One of the most damaging legacies of traditional CSR in the extractive sector has been the obsession with projects rather than processes.

A borehole, a classroom, or a health centre means little if:

• It was not requested by the community
• It cannot be maintained
• It does not address root causes
• It exists only for commissioning photographs

The future of CSR lies in process-driven accountability, not project visibility.

At CSR REPORTERS, we believe credible CSR in extractive environments must begin with comprehensive community needs assessments. Without this foundation, every intervention is guesswork.

Needs assessments are not delays. They are safeguards.

Stakeholder Engagement Is Not Optional

True stakeholder engagement goes beyond courtesy visits and town-hall meetings staged after decisions have already been made.

Effective engagement requires:

• Early involvement of traditional institutions
• Inclusion of youth, women, and marginalised groups
• Collaboration with civil society organisations
• Ongoing dialogue, not episodic communication

Traditional rulers, such as the Olú of Warri, are not obstacles to development. They are custodians of legitimacy and continuity. Ignoring them weakens trust before projects even begin.

Companies that institutionalise stakeholder engagement do not lose control. They gain credibility.

Rethinking Host Community Development Trusts

HCDTs should not become extensions of corporate CSR departments. Their credibility depends on alignment with clearly identified community priorities, not corporate branding strategies.

For HCDTs to work, companies must:

• Respect governance structures
• Avoid undue influence in fund allocation
• Support capacity building within communities
• Commit to transparency in reporting

When HCDTs function properly, they reduce conflict, stabilise operations, and create shared value. When they are manipulated, they deepen resentment and resistance.

Measuring What Matters

One of the weakest points in CSR practice remains impact measurement. Many companies report activities rather than outcomes.

In the ESG era, this is no longer sufficient.

Extractive companies must track:

• Environmental remediation outcomes
• Employment and skills development impact
• Social cohesion and conflict reduction indicators
• Governance effectiveness of community structures

Public disclosure of these metrics is not a risk. It is protection.

Transparency builds trust with regulators, investors, communities, and the wider public.

A Moral Principle with Practical Consequences

The principle is simple and universal:

Do unto others what you would want others to do unto you.

Applied to extractive operations, this means:

• Treating communities as partners, not obstacles
• Protecting environments as assets, not expendables
• Governing resources with integrity, not expediency

Anything less is not CSR. It is a failure of responsibility.

A Call to Action for Nigeria’s Extractive Sector

Nigeria stands at a crossroads. The voices of traditional leaders, the provisions of the PIA, and the demands of ESG have converged into a single message.

The old ways no longer work.

CSR must now be:

• Evidence-based
• Community-driven
• ESG-aligned
• Transparently reported

Companies that adapt will secure their social licence to operate and their relevance in a changing global economy. Those that do not will face rising resistance, scrutiny, and risk.

The Role of Accountability Platforms

At CSR REPORTERS, we exist to amplify credible impact, scrutinise weak practices, and raise standards across Africa’s CSR and sustainability landscape.

We believe accountability is not antagonistic to business. It is essential to its survival.

If your organisation requires support in:

• Community needs assessments
• Stakeholder engagement frameworks
• CSR and ESG documentation
• Impact measurement and reporting
• Aligning CSR with the PIA

Reach out to us:
bd@csrreporters.com | enquiries@csrreporters.com

Because in today’s Nigeria, doing otherwise is no longer an option.

[give_form id="20698"]