Much ado about noise pollution

The Enugu State Government’s recent directive to places of worship, clubs, bars, and other establishments to dismantle their loudspeakers within 90 days or face legal consequences marks a significant step in addressing noise pollution in the state.

While the initiative aims to improve the quality of life for residents, who have long complained about disrupted sleep and daily disturbances, it also raises questions about governmental priorities in a country grappling with more pressing issues.

There is no denying that noise pollution is a serious environmental concern. It disrupts peace, contributes to stress, and diminishes the overall quality of life. In urban areas like Enugu, where urbanization and nightlife are on the rise, the unchecked blaring of loudspeakers from various establishments can indeed create an unbearable living environment for residents. The government’s “zero noise” policy, as articulated by Uche Anya, the Executive Chairman of the Enugu Capital Territory Development Authority (ECTDA), is a commendable attempt to address these valid complaints.

However, while this policy is well-intentioned, it seems to miss the mark on what should be the government’s immediate focus. Nigeria is currently facing economic hardships that are far more pressing than noise pollution. The cost of living has skyrocketed, unemployment rates are alarmingly high, and millions of Nigerians are struggling to put food on the table. In such a context, the enforcement of noise control, though necessary, may not resonate with a populace whose primary concerns are survival and basic economic stability.

The harsh realities of living in Nigeria today demand that the government prioritize its resources and efforts toward addressing the more urgent needs of its people. Economic policies that alleviate poverty, create jobs, and stabilize prices should be at the forefront of any governmental agenda. Noise pollution, while important, pales in comparison to the existential challenges many Nigerians face daily.

Furthermore, the implementation of noise control policies is often fraught with challenges. As seen in Lagos, where the Environmental Protection Agency (LASEPA) has struggled to effectively curb noise pollution despite having regulations in place, enforcement is typically weak, and corruption among officials often undermines these efforts. Without the necessary political will and transparency, Enugu’s noise pollution crackdown may end up as just another unfulfilled government promise, adding to the frustration of the populace.

Also, the cultural and social dimensions of noise in Nigeria cannot be overlooked. Religious activities and nightlife are deeply ingrained in the social fabric of many communities. The use of loudspeakers, for better or worse, has become a norm in public worship and entertainment. While these activities should certainly be regulated to prevent excesses, the government must approach the issue with sensitivity and an understanding of these cultural contexts. Imposing strict noise control measures without adequate public consultation or consideration of these factors could lead to unintended backlash.

CSR REPORTERS notes that while the Enugu State Government’s initiative to curb noise pollution is a step in the right direction, it must be balanced against the more urgent economic needs of the people. The government should focus on policies that directly improve the livelihoods of its citizens, while also ensuring that any noise control measures are implemented fairly, transparently, and with cultural sensitivity. After all, a quiet environment is of little comfort to those who cannot afford to live in it.